Back to Blog
CRA

CRA Reporting Obligations Are Now in Effect — Existing Products Cannot Be Ignored

CRA Article 14 reporting obligations have applied since September 11, 2026—and they are not limited to new products. Manufacturers with existing products on the EU market now need the ability to assess vulnerability impact and respond within the CRA’s reporting timelines.

Product Line
Cross-Product Line
Topic
CRA Compliance
Published
2026-09-18
Read Time
15
min read

Many companies see December 11, 2027 as the main deadline for the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and assume they still have more than a year to prepare. But that view misses two important points:

  1. CRA reporting obligations have already applied since September 11, 2026.
  2. Products already placed on the EU market are also subject to these reporting obligations.

CRA Has More Than One Important Deadline

The CRA entered into force in late 2024, but its requirements apply in stages:

  • June 11, 2026: Provisions related to conformity assessment bodies began to apply, preparing the framework for third-party conformity assessment.
  • September 11, 2026: Article 14 reporting obligations began to apply. Manufacturers must report actively exploited vulnerabilities and severe incidents having an impact on the security of products with digital elements when the applicable conditions are met.
  • December 11, 2027: The CRA becomes fully applicable, bringing the broader requirements for cybersecurity risk assessment, vulnerability handling, technical documentation, conformity assessment, and product security into effect. EUR-Lex

The 24-Hour Clock Starts When You Become Aware

Since September 11, 2026, when a reportable vulnerability or incident occurs, manufacturers face a staged reporting process:

  • Within 24 hours: Submit an early warning based on the information available.
  • Within 72 hours: Submit a more complete notification with additional information on the affected product, vulnerability or incident, initial impact, and mitigation measures.
  • Final report: For an actively exploited vulnerability, submit the final report no later than 14 days after a corrective or mitigating measure becomes available. For a severe incident, submit it no later than one month after the 72-hour notification.

Reports are submitted through the CRA Single Reporting Platform (SRP).

One common misunderstanding is that manufacturers have 24 hours to fix the vulnerability or complete the entire investigation.

They do not.

The CRA uses staged reporting: manufacturers first report what they know and provide additional information as the investigation progresses.

The real pressure is that the clock starts when the manufacturer becomes aware of the issue, not when a patch is ready or the investigation is complete.

Suppose your security team learns that a third-party component contains a vulnerability and there is reliable evidence that attackers are actively exploiting it.

You immediately need to answer:

  • Which products and firmware versions are affected?
  • Which of those products have been placed on the EU market?
  • Does the vulnerability meet the CRA reporting threshold?
  • When exactly did the company become aware of the issue?
  • Who decides whether reporting should begin?
  • Who is responsible for submitting the report through the SRP?

If these questions cannot be answered in advance, 24 hours is not enough time to search through codebases, identify affected versions, and find the right decision-makers.

This is why product inventories, Software Bills of Materials (SBOMs), and mappings between products, firmware versions, and software components are no longer just compliance paperwork.

They become the navigation system for vulnerability response.

Without them, even answering the basic question — “Which of our products are affected?” — can become difficult.

Existing Products Cannot Be Ignored

Another common assumption is:

“The products we currently sell in Europe were developed years ago. We can simply make our new products CRA-compliant in 2027.”

That is not how the reporting obligation works.

The CRA does provide transitional provisions for products placed on the market before December 11, 2027. In general, those products do not automatically become subject to all CRA requirements unless they undergo a substantial modification after that date.

However, Article 14 reporting obligations are an explicit exception.

Article 69(3) states that the Article 14 obligations apply to all products with digital elements within the scope of the CRA that were placed on the market before December 11, 2027.

For example, suppose you launched a smart gateway in Europe in 2024. The product was obviously not designed according to CRA requirements. But if a vulnerability in that product meets the Article 14 reporting conditions, the manufacturer is still subject to the reporting process.

This means the immediate impact of the CRA reporting obligations is not limited to new products still under development. It also reaches the installed base of existing products.

Reporting Obligations Are Already in Effect: Three Things Companies Should Do Now

Companies do not necessarily need to complete every aspect of their 2027 CRA compliance program immediately.

But three areas should no longer be delayed:

1. Make Sure the Reporting Process Actually Works

Define:

  • Where vulnerability information comes from;
  • Who determines whether an issue is reportable;
  • Who starts the 24/72-hour process;
  • Who submits through the SRP;
  • How engineering, security, legal, and management teams coordinate.

A tabletop exercise can be useful.

Assume that a third-party component is suddenly found to be actively exploited. Walk through the entire process from the security team receiving the information to submitting the early warning.

The goal is to determine whether the 24-hour response process actually works in practice.

2. Build an Inventory of Products Already on the EU Market

At a minimum, understand:

  • Which products have been placed on the EU market;
  • Their main models and firmware versions;
  • Which team owns each product;
  • Which critical third-party components they contain.

You do not need to build a complex system on day one.

But you do need a product inventory that can be continuously maintained.

Otherwise, when a vulnerability appears, determining which European products are affected becomes an emergency investigation.

3. Build Vulnerability Impact Analysis Capabilities

Gradually establish clear relationships between:

Product → Firmware → Third-Party Components → SBOM → Vulnerabilities

When the security team receives new vulnerability information, it should be able to quickly identify potentially affected products and versions instead of asking each engineering team to investigate from scratch.

Once these capabilities are in place, companies can work backward from December 11, 2027 to build their broader CRA compliance roadmap.

That roadmap will involve much more than reporting, including Security by Design, cybersecurity risk assessment, vulnerability handling, security updates, technical documentation, conformity assessment, and lifecycle security management.

The Countdown Is Over — The Real Test Has Started

CRA penalties can be significant. For certain violations, administrative fines can reach up to €15 million or 2.5% of total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher.

But for companies selling into Europe, the more immediate pressure may also come from customers and supply chains. CRA readiness and vulnerability response capabilities may increasingly become part of supplier reviews and procurement assessments.

If you focus only on December 2027, it may still feel like there is plenty of time.

But for companies that already have products on the EU market, Article 14 reporting obligations have applied since September 11, 2026.

From now on, when a qualifying actively exploited vulnerability or severe security incident occurs, manufacturers face defined reporting deadlines.

Whether a company can make an initial decision within 24 hours and determine the affected scope within 72 hours depends heavily on whether it already understands the relationships between its products, firmware versions, software components, and vulnerabilities.

References

Snowball Team
Team Member
LinkedIn
Founded in 2013, committed to driving scalable and sustainable industry growth through a trusted, future-ready security infrastructure. Snowball Technology’s core team comes from NXP’s security services group, bringing over a decade of experience in device security. The company currently has more than 100 employees, with over two-thirds in R&D. Snowball Technology is certified under international standards including ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and ISO 27001.